Post

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading ... Loading ...

By James Bach
Michael Bolton, my brother Jon, and I have produced a new version of our Exploratory Testing Dynamics document. We unveiled it last week at STPCON.
This document describes the elements of exploratory testing as we currently understand them. This new version has not yet been reviewed by Cem Kaner or any of our colleagues who normally have opinions on this, but I don’t anticipate that it will be revised much when they do. It should be fairly stable, for now.
ET cannot be summed up fairly as “unstructured playing around” and if you look at this document you will see why. If nothing else, count the elements in it. Crikey.
The document consists of four lists:
1. Evolving Work Products
Exploratory testing is an approach that emphasizes evolution. We start with something and make it better and better. Often testers can be overly focused on finding bugs, but look at all the things that get better. For instance, you can run your automated regression tests a thousand times and the tests don’t learn and neither do the button pushing testers. But you learn a lot by sapiently retesting– you evolve. One of the products of ET is a better tester.
Some evolution also happens in highly scripted testing, but in ET it’s a primary goal. It’s the point.
2. Skills and Tactics
What does an exploratory tester do? Well, feast your eyes on the Skills and Tactics list. Each of those items are things that seem to us to be reasonably independent, teachable, and observable. Some of them are also skills that a highly scripted tester would need, but they work a little differently for explorers. For instance, the skills of reading and analyzing documents means doing that to prepare for or aid exploration of the product, rather than to prepare detailed instructions for scripted test execution.
3. ET Polarities
The Polarities list is unique to ET. An exploratory tester must manage his own mental process, and that process is about developing ideas and using those ideas to search the product for trouble. We’ve found over years of experience doing this that a tester loses steam if he spends too long in one train or type of thought. So, what can he do?
One answer is alternation. We alternate among complementary activities. Two activities are complementary if performing one of them rejuvenates the other. A great example is reading about a product and directly interacting with it.
4. Test Strategy
The Heuristic Test Strategy model is a set of guideword heuristics that we publish as part of the Rapid Software Testing class. In addition to the general ideas of exploration, evolution, and alternation, the guidewords represent the specific subject matter of testing– the conditions we need to succeed, the things we look at, the things we look for, and the specific test techniques we use to produce tests.
With these lists, I can systematically evaluate a tester and identify strengths and weaknesses. We in the Context-Driven School of testing need models like this, because we focus on skills, rather than techniques and tools. This document allows us to focus our efforts and develop specific exercises for tester training.

Source: http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/370

Category: Exploratory Testing, Skills

Você também pode querer ler

Comments are off for this post.